Sunday, March 20, 2011

Which source of energy is statistically the deadliest?...Are you sure about that?


Source: Carpe Diem
 Note: TWH stands for "Terra-watt per hour".

6 comments:

  1. This indicates even more clearly that it would be in the best interest of our country to focus on alternative ways to provide energy and fuel. Opportunity Cost: With alternative energy utilized and coal deaths down think about how those workers could help boster the economy in other ways.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I was actually reading about this a few days ago. Nuclear power gets all of the attention because, when things go wrong, it's very scary, but coal seems to cause more harm behind the scenes.

    I don't think this will change anyone's mind though, and I doubt something like this will get much coverage in the media.

    ReplyDelete
  3. The granite used in Grand central station actually gives off too much radiation to pass specifications as a nuclear reactor. so they are safer than people think.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Did North Korea make this map, or something?
    'Cause this is like unbelievable....

    ReplyDelete
  5. For some reason I still think nuclear is the most dangerous even though this chart shows that nuclear is the least deadliest. I guess I just don't fully understands why it would not be the most dangerous one but coal is.

    ReplyDelete
  6. No Daria.... Ching Chong Chu did ... (that's you KIM). I believe this is where people start becoming misinformed. Only because "it's in a graph" does it mean its accuracy is sky high..

    ReplyDelete

View My Stats