![]() |
| Source: Carpe Diem |
Economics, civics, constitutional law, Supreme Court cases, AP Economics teaching resources, and classroom lessons by a retired social studies teacher.
Friday, April 15, 2011
Thursday, April 14, 2011
How much of your "Made in America" vehicle ACTUALLY is Made in America? You will be surprised by these numbers...
How much of your "Made in America" car is actually made in America? Below is a list of cars and their content of American made/sourced parts in percentage terms. It is interesting to note the domestic and foreign mix of manufacturers. Toyota, Honda and Acura have vehicles with MORE American made parts than many of the US manufacturers.
We have to re-think what it means to "Buy American"--could it really mean "Buy Japanese to get Made in America"???...
1. Dodge Avenger 83%
2. Chrysler 200 81%
3. Toyota Camry 80%
Toyota Avalon 80%
Honda Accord 80%
4. Chevrolet Impala 77%
5. Cadillac CTS 76%
Buick Lucerne 76%
6. Chevrolet Malibu 75%
Chevrolet Corvette 75%
Lincoln Town Car 75%
Acura TL 75%
7. Dodge Caliber 73%
Chrysler 300 73%
8. Dodge Charger 70%
Dodge Challenger 70%
Honda Civic 70%
9. Chevrolet Camaro 66%
10. Toyota Matrix 65%
Cadillac STS 65%
Cadillac CTS 65%
Ford Taurus 65%
Ford Mustang 65%
HT: Carpe Diem
We have to re-think what it means to "Buy American"--could it really mean "Buy Japanese to get Made in America"???...
1. Dodge Avenger 83%
2. Chrysler 200 81%
3. Toyota Camry 80%
Toyota Avalon 80%
Honda Accord 80%
4. Chevrolet Impala 77%
5. Cadillac CTS 76%
Buick Lucerne 76%
6. Chevrolet Malibu 75%
Chevrolet Corvette 75%
Lincoln Town Car 75%
Acura TL 75%
7. Dodge Caliber 73%
Chrysler 300 73%
8. Dodge Charger 70%
Dodge Challenger 70%
Honda Civic 70%
9. Chevrolet Camaro 66%
10. Toyota Matrix 65%
Cadillac STS 65%
Cadillac CTS 65%
Ford Taurus 65%
Ford Mustang 65%
HT: Carpe Diem
Rising food prices hurt the extreme poor around the world (see chart)...There is a solution, but it ain't never gonna happen...
Food prices matter...Look for more political instability in the more vulnerable parts of the world if this trend is not reversed. Let me beat the dead horse one more time---Corn-based Ethanol causes people to starve to death---If you grow more corn for ethanol, you have less to eat. Farmers grow more corn which means they grow less of the other agricultural commodities on the list. Beef becomes more expensive because corn-based feed becomes more expensive---die, horse, die, so more PEOPLE can live...
Food prices: World Bank warns millions face poverty
Food prices: World Bank warns millions face poverty
World food prices are 36% above levels of a year ago, driven by problems in the Middle East and North Africa, and remain volatile, the bank said.
That has pushed 44 million people into poverty since last June.
A further 10% rise would push 10m more below the extreme poverty line of $1.25 (76p) a day, the bank said.
And it warned that a 30% cost hike in the price of staples could lead to 34 million more poor.
Wednesday, April 13, 2011
Tuesday, April 12, 2011
Need the help of a math guru to check my work on an Elasticity problem...Be gentle. I am willing to learn..:)
I need the help of a math guru. Check my analysis below and tell me if I am right, wrong, or somewhere in the middle. Be nice...math is REALLY not my strong point, but I am willing to learn... :)
This graphic in today's NYTimes provides an opportunity of look at the elasticity of demand for gasoline. It is not a perfect measurement because it is not in terms of quantity demanded for gasoline, but miles driven. I am going to assume there is an inverse relationship between the price of gas and miles driven.
Using the Elasticity of Demand equation we divide 1.27% by 90%. This yields .014. A number less than 1 means demand is relatively INELASTIC, which suggests the change in quantity demanded is not very responsive to changes in price. This is a VERY small number and indicates demand is almost perfectly inelastic (the demand curve is downward sloping but almost vertical)
Does this make sense? Thanks!
This graphic in today's NYTimes provides an opportunity of look at the elasticity of demand for gasoline. It is not a perfect measurement because it is not in terms of quantity demanded for gasoline, but miles driven. I am going to assume there is an inverse relationship between the price of gas and miles driven.
![]() |
| Source: NYTimes |
Elasticity is determined by taking the percentage change in the quantity divided by the percentage change in price. I am guesstimating, but I would say in 2005 miles driven is approx. 2.9625 (1/4 of .5 trillions miles plus 2.95 trillion miles) and 3.0 Trillion in 2011. That makes the percentage change from 2005 to 2011 +1.27%.
The percentage change in price from 2005 ($2.00) to 2011 ($3.79) is 90% (rounded up slightly).
Using the Elasticity of Demand equation we divide 1.27% by 90%. This yields .014. A number less than 1 means demand is relatively INELASTIC, which suggests the change in quantity demanded is not very responsive to changes in price. This is a VERY small number and indicates demand is almost perfectly inelastic (the demand curve is downward sloping but almost vertical)
Does this make sense? Thanks!
Sunday, April 10, 2011
President Obama and Former BP CEO Tony Hayward appear to be kindred souls...Both just want their lives back...
I dislike it when someone (Presidents, CEO's, actors, etc) who seeks fame and fortune, and are well compensated for it, lament the fact that they cannot remain anonymous or just have a "regular life". I understand what they are saying but I believe you forfeit this privilege when you put yourself in the public eye. So, suck it up cupcake---you can't have it both ways (TANSTAAFL)...
I thought I have heard something similar, but I can't quite recall where...Oh, yea, now I remember...
"I just miss - I miss being anonymous," he said at the meeting in the White House. "I miss Saturday morning, rolling out of bed, not shaving, getting into my car with my girls, driving to the supermarket, squeezing the fruit, getting my car washed, taking walks. I can't take a walk."---Pres Barack Obama.
I thought I have heard something similar, but I can't quite recall where...Oh, yea, now I remember...
"We're sorry for the massive disruption it's caused their lives. There's no one who wants this over more than I do. I would like my life back."--Tony Hayward, BP Oil Company CEO...
A nice chart showing the increase in the National Debt Ceiling over time...Only LeBron James has a higher vertical leap...
This chart shows the number of times the debt ceiling has been raised since 1980 (it is the stair-stepped line). Notice the change in the slope of the National Debt line (the smooth one) over time, especially since 2001. It has become almost vertical. A picture is worth a 1,000 words--or the word "dollars" 14.2 Trillion times and counting...
Full Story below the fold....
![]() |
| Source: NYTIMES |
Full Story below the fold....
The employment picture is looking up, if we take the collective word of corporate CEO's...I hope they are right...
A survey (NYTimes: In a Survey of Bosses, Good News for Job Seekers) of CEO's in the US suggests that a hiring spur may occur in the coming months. This is very good news if it plays out. The magnitude of the job creation is still a major question:
""All the surveys are aimed at measuring the breadth of employment plans, as opposed to the magnitude of such plans. So a company planning to add a few workers would count just as much as one planning to add thousands.""
Optimism about the future will drive business expansion and staffing requirments. The convergence of large corporate profits as of late and declining productivity per worker amid increasing demand for goods and services will drive hiring in the last half of the year. Barring some exogenous event that would derail the recovery, things are looking up. This is a bright and shiny as I get, students....
Read the entire story here: In a Survey of Bosses, Good News for Job Seekers .
Or here:
Saturday, April 9, 2011
Snooki's speaking fee is $25,000 per appearance...WOW, what a bargain!!!
Is Snooki worth the speaking fee she receives? Rutgers University paid $32,000 for her to come to speak to students. However, apparently she receives a usual fee of $25,000 to cavort with paying customers at clubs. Does the business get is money worth? By the estimate given in the article below (full article below the fold) the change in revenue (Marginal Revenue) for a Snooki appearance is approx. $260,000. Far in excess of the extra cost of hiring her (Marginal Cost) for $25,000. Marginal Revenue is greater than Marginal Cost...In Microeconomics, we learn that to maximizes profits, they should hire her until the change in revenue equals her speaking fee (Marginal Revenue $25,000=Marginal Cost $25,000)...guessing that might happen after (during) the second appearance....
Snookinomics: Profits from a Tan
Snookinomics: Profits from a Tan
Nice article on cost savings from attending a Community College for a year or two...Worth a read...
Nice article on the virtues of attending a Community College for the first year or two of college before transferring. Smart adive. The only thing I would add, would to advise against taking classes in subjects that pertain to your major. For example, if you are going to be a math major don't take math classes at a C.C., take those at the University level. Take your English or Social Studies classes instead, because they will impact your major less. If you are going to be an English major, take your math classes at a C.C....So on and so forth, whatever you major in.
NYTIMES: Bargains on the First 4 Semesters
When Rich Johnston started college in the 1970s, four years at a standard university was out of the question financially. So he worked, knocked off two years of community college credits in 19 months and then worked some more.
He ended up graduating in 1981 from the University of Puget Sound, a private college in Tacoma, Wash. “Nobody ever asked where I went the first two years, and I don’t think anybody cares,” he said. “And I bet I saved myself $30,000.”
When it came time for his son Bret to start college, Bret decided to take the same path, choosing smaller classes, a more flexible schedule and a price that was a fraction of what he might have paid in Washington’s state university system.
He is hardly the only one. A few weeks ago, in a “Your Money” special section of the newspaper, I wrote about Mino Caulton, a high school senior in Shutesbury, Mass., who was weighing the virtues of a community college versus a more prestigious private university that would have required him to take out lots of student loans.
Advice for Mr. Caulton poured in on our Bucks blog, and it became clear that there were few centralized resources for families who had made a strategic financial decision to attend community college first as a cost-saving measure.
NYTIMES: Bargains on the First 4 Semesters
When Rich Johnston started college in the 1970s, four years at a standard university was out of the question financially. So he worked, knocked off two years of community college credits in 19 months and then worked some more.
He ended up graduating in 1981 from the University of Puget Sound, a private college in Tacoma, Wash. “Nobody ever asked where I went the first two years, and I don’t think anybody cares,” he said. “And I bet I saved myself $30,000.”
When it came time for his son Bret to start college, Bret decided to take the same path, choosing smaller classes, a more flexible schedule and a price that was a fraction of what he might have paid in Washington’s state university system.
He is hardly the only one. A few weeks ago, in a “Your Money” special section of the newspaper, I wrote about Mino Caulton, a high school senior in Shutesbury, Mass., who was weighing the virtues of a community college versus a more prestigious private university that would have required him to take out lots of student loans.
Advice for Mr. Caulton poured in on our Bucks blog, and it became clear that there were few centralized resources for families who had made a strategic financial decision to attend community college first as a cost-saving measure.
How could the House budget-cutters miss this EASY program to do away with? Subsidies to install gas pumps to dispense E-85 gas with Ethanol...Please help me pick up the pieces of my exploding head...
What a way to start the day. I sit down with a nice cup of coffee and this gem pops out from the WSJ....Grants and subsidized loans to install new gas pumps so we can sell gasoline that has even more ethanol (E-85) which everyone, but the ethanol lobby, believes is bad policy...How was this NOT low hanging budget fruit subject to cutting in the budget battle that went deep into the night?
The Secretary of Agriculture declined to say how much the program would cost because he did not know how many station owners (or oil companies) would take advantage of the program...Fair enough, I get that. But a better question for him from would have been how much has been budgeted for such a program. THAT he should know. Wish the reporter had asked that. OR better yet, a budget-cutting ELECTED official...Just sayin'...
Gas Stations Get Aid to Sell Ethanol
"""The Department of Agriculture will soon be helping gasoline stations install new pumps that can dispense fuel with higher ethanol content, USDA Secretary Tom Vilsack said.
The USDA will soon offer grants and loan guarantees for the installation of costly new "blender pumps" so drivers can purchase fuel with a higher ratio of corn-based ethanol.
Most gasoline sold in the U.S. is 10% ethanol, but a growing fleet of flexible-fuel vehicles can run on an 85%-ethanol blend, or E85. However, there are fewer pumps available to dispense it, Mr. Vilsack said.
In the U.S., only about 2,350 fueling stations out of more than 110,000 offer E85 pumps, according to the USDA.
Gloria Bergquist, vice president of the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers, said the number of E85 vehicles in the U.S. is growing about 10% each year. In 2008, there were 6.1 million such vehicles; now, the number has increased to about 8.2 million.
New blender pumps, which Mr. Vilsack said cost about $120,000 to install, also would make it easier for drivers of conventional cars to increase the ethanol content of the gasoline they buy. He declined to estimate the total expenses, saying he didn't know how many station owners would seek the guarantees and grants. """
The Secretary of Agriculture declined to say how much the program would cost because he did not know how many station owners (or oil companies) would take advantage of the program...Fair enough, I get that. But a better question for him from would have been how much has been budgeted for such a program. THAT he should know. Wish the reporter had asked that. OR better yet, a budget-cutting ELECTED official...Just sayin'...
Gas Stations Get Aid to Sell Ethanol
"""The Department of Agriculture will soon be helping gasoline stations install new pumps that can dispense fuel with higher ethanol content, USDA Secretary Tom Vilsack said.
The USDA will soon offer grants and loan guarantees for the installation of costly new "blender pumps" so drivers can purchase fuel with a higher ratio of corn-based ethanol.
Most gasoline sold in the U.S. is 10% ethanol, but a growing fleet of flexible-fuel vehicles can run on an 85%-ethanol blend, or E85. However, there are fewer pumps available to dispense it, Mr. Vilsack said.
In the U.S., only about 2,350 fueling stations out of more than 110,000 offer E85 pumps, according to the USDA.
Gloria Bergquist, vice president of the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers, said the number of E85 vehicles in the U.S. is growing about 10% each year. In 2008, there were 6.1 million such vehicles; now, the number has increased to about 8.2 million.
New blender pumps, which Mr. Vilsack said cost about $120,000 to install, also would make it easier for drivers of conventional cars to increase the ethanol content of the gasoline they buy. He declined to estimate the total expenses, saying he didn't know how many station owners would seek the guarantees and grants. """
Friday, April 8, 2011
Dollar Depreciates overnight...get ready to pay more for "stuff"...
A nice article illustrating two AP Macro concepts. The first is the interest rate effect on the value of currencies relative to each other. The European Central Bank (ECB) raised a benchmark interest rate yesterday. As interest rates increase, we know financial capital flows to the "more desirable FINANCIAL ASSETS. In this case European financial assets. Hence, the demand for the Euro increased in the last 24 hours and the Euro has appreciated relative to the Dollar.
In the short run (there seems to be debate about the long run) there is an inverse relationship between the value of the dollar in the FOREX and various commodities (metals, agricultural, oil, etc). This is because most/all major commodities are traded on world markets in dollars. When the dollar depreciates then foreign sellers of commodities need to get more dollars (relative to before the depreciation) for their product just to maintain the same purchasing power of their own currency back in the home country. This is the blessing and the curse of having the dollar as the currency of record for international trade.
Commodities rally as dollar slumps
In the short run (there seems to be debate about the long run) there is an inverse relationship between the value of the dollar in the FOREX and various commodities (metals, agricultural, oil, etc). This is because most/all major commodities are traded on world markets in dollars. When the dollar depreciates then foreign sellers of commodities need to get more dollars (relative to before the depreciation) for their product just to maintain the same purchasing power of their own currency back in the home country. This is the blessing and the curse of having the dollar as the currency of record for international trade.
Commodities rally as dollar slumps
The dollar has hit a fresh 15-month low as traders move into euros following the European Central Bank’s rate rise on Thursday.
Investors are dumping the buck as the US Federal Reserve is seen lagging in the nascent tightening cycle, while worries about a government shutdown should Washington budget talks fail are also adding to pressure on the greenback.
Commodities are a big beneficiary of the dollar’s decline. Dollar-denominated commodities like a softer buck and it seems the market is also still fond of the greenback as an inverse proxy to broad risk appetite.
Silver is in focus after it hit $40 an ounce for the first time since 1980 as traders also ride the “bullion-as-inflation-hedge” bandwagon.
The same strategy has also driven gold to a fresh record of $1,471 an ounce, with investors pouring funds into precious-metal exchange-traded funds.
Sunday, April 3, 2011
Chart of worst jobs in History...I had one in college that I think can be added to the list...judge for yourself...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)












