Sunday, April 10, 2011

The employment picture is looking up, if we take the collective word of corporate CEO's...I hope they are right...

A survey (NYTimes: In a Survey of Bosses, Good News for Job Seekers) of CEO's in the US suggests that a hiring spur may occur in the coming months. This is very good news if it plays out.  The magnitude of the job creation is still a major question:

""All the surveys are aimed at measuring the breadth of employment plans, as opposed to the magnitude of such plans. So a company planning to add a few workers would count just as much as one planning to add thousands.""  

Optimism about the future will drive business expansion and staffing requirments. The convergence of large corporate profits as of late and declining productivity per worker amid increasing demand for goods and services will drive hiring in the last half of the year.  Barring some exogenous event that would derail the recovery, things are looking up.  This is a bright and shiny as I get, students....

Read the entire story here: In a Survey of Bosses, Good News for Job Seekers .

Or here:




AMERICAN companies say they plan to hire. If they do as they say, the unemployment picture will brighten considerably.


In a quarterly survey of chief executives, the Business Roundtable found that 52 percent of companies planned to hire workers in the United States over the next six months, while just 11 percent said they expected to reduce employment.

Never before have so many chief executives said they planned to hire, or so few said they planned to cut payrolls. The survey has been taken every three months since late 2002.

The Business Roundtable includes chief executives of 200 major American companies. If most of them did add workers, that would almost certainly have a substantial effect on employment in the country. Two other broader surveys of companies are taken each month by the Institute for Supply Management. Its survey of manufacturers has been showing more companies planning to increase employment than reduce it since the fall of 2009, and indeed manufacturing employment rose in 2010 for the first full year since 1997, according to the Labor Department.

It took longer for service companies to begin hiring. But the I.S.M. survey of such companies has shown positive readings since last fall, and the latest government report indicates that employment in that sector has risen to the highest level in two years.

All the surveys are aimed at measuring the breadth of employment plans, as opposed to the magnitude of such plans. So a company planning to add a few workers would count just as much as one planning to add thousands.

Whatever the companies say, though, consumers remain far from certain that jobs will materialize. In the latest consumer confidence survey by the Conference Board, only 20 percent of respondents said they expected jobs to be added to the economy over the next six months, slightly fewer than the number who expected a decline. Still, consumers have a history of pessimism in that survey, as is shown in the chart, and the proportion expecting gains is higher than it was in the years before the recession.

The I.S.M. numbers are normally presented on a scale of zero to 100, with 50 indicating that as many companies are hiring as are firing; numbers above that level indicating more hiring. The higher the figure, the more prevalent hiring is. In the charts, the figures are rebased so that zero is the neutral number.

Both the service and manufacturing figures slipped a little in March, which could indicate that growth is slowing. But the manufacturing figures for each of the first three months of 2011 were higher than in any previous month since 1973.

The Business Roundtable survey was conducted from Feb. 28 through March 18, and received responses from 142 of the 200 chief executives, which the organization said was the largest response rate ever.

The survey includes three questions, each of which produced unusually optimistic responses. Asked about their own companies’ plans for capital spending in the United States, 62 percent said they planned increases, while 6 percent expected to reduce spending. That was the best response since the first quarter of 2005, when 60 percent planned increases and only 3 percent expected to spend less.

In response to another question, 92 percent of the chief executives said they expected increases in sales for their companies, while none said they expected a decline. It was the first time that none of the executives thought sales would decline.

3 comments:

  1. This article, if only in its optomistic approach to the job horizon, is a light of encouragement for job seekers. According to the survey taken by the Business Roundtable 92 percent of the chief executives said they expected increases in sales for their companies. So, in relation to the optomistic tone of this article GDP seems to be on the rise. I have also noticed that even as GDP rises the national debt can still accumulate at a very formitable rate. For example, when GDP rises above full employment, price levels rise which drives up inflation, price paid on interest, and eventually the national debt. Therefore, I wonder with an increase in unemployment in the future, which is altogether very encouraging, if the national debt will increase as well and what kind of impact that will have on quality of life for Americans. Are all increases in productivity good indicators of America's emergence out of our recession.

    ReplyDelete
  2. It's great that companies plan on hiring more, but there has to be a catch (doesn't there?). Companies can hire more, but then decide to fire older workers to bring in fresher faces. Or it could just increase productivity, which would shift our productions possibility curve to the right.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hmmm... I wonder if the CEOs are only -saying- they will hire more in an effort to make the future look brighter and have -other- CEOs hire more workers... Is there a graph that charts GDP as a result of optimism? XD Optimism does work as the cause of an increase in demand though... And if demand for workers shifts to the right, employment nears full employment.... Huh. Psychology vs Economics.

    ReplyDelete

View My Stats